| Peer-Reviewed

Research on the Framework of the Evaluation System of College Students' Learning Process

Received: 13 February 2023    Accepted: 21 March 2023    Published: 28 March 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

To construct the evaluation system of college students' learning process, there are three layers: target layer, criterion layer and sub-criterion layer. There are five first-level indicators in the criteria layer, which are the individuation of learning process, the individuation of learning analysis, the coupling of learning, the autonomy of learning process and the creativity of learning process. There are 17 secondary indicators in the sub-criteria layer. The establishment of a good hierarchical structure is the premise of using AHP to solve problems. The basis of analyzing problems is to build a multi-level structure by layering various influencing factors. To determine the relationship between the elements, and according to the controlling relationship of the upper layer to the factors of the lower layer, the influencing factors are hierarchical, and then the hierarchical structure model of the upper layer and the lower layer is constructed, the geometric average method is used to calculate the average of the experts. The geometric average method ensures the reciprocal character of the matrix. Six judgment matrices are obtained by sorting the data, using MATLAB tool to calculate the weight value of each layer index of each judgment matrix, and carry on the consistency test, obtain the weight value of each layer index, the judgment matrix has passed the consistency evaluation, to achieve the overall objectives of the system and put forward all the measures, decision-making programs.

Published in Science Discovery (Volume 11, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.sd.20231102.11
Page(s) 29-34
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process, Student Learning Process Evaluation, Evaluation Indicators, Higher Education

References
[1] 张红梅. 美国高校学生评价方法研究 [D]. 上海: 华东师范大学硕士学位论文, 2005.
[2] 孙士杰, 张国荣, 冯喜英. 高校学生学业成就评价现状及改革的研究 [J]. 河南师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2000 (5): 106-112.
[3] 赵小青. 基于创新能人才培养的大学生学习过程评价研究 [J]. 湖南医科大学学报 (社会科学版), 2008 (2): 230-237.
[4] 赵士果. 促进学习的课堂评价研究 [D]. 上海: 华东师范大学博士学位论文, 2013: 24-27.
[5] Satterly, D.. Assessment in school [M]. New York: Blackwell Ltd., 1989: 1.
[6] Swaffield, S.. Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning [J]. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 2011, 18 (12): 443-449.
[7] Drummond, M. J.. Aessing children’s learning [M], London: David Fulton, 2003: 13.
[8] Berry, R.. Assessment for leaning [M]. Hongkong University Press, 2008: 6.
[9] Airasian, P. 著, 徐士强译. 课堂评估: 理论与实践 [M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2008: 9.
[10] 姜艳华. 试论过程性评价与结果性评价的同一 [J]. 当代教育论坛, 2007 (4): 52-59.
[11] 丁念金. 中学生学习过程自我评价机制探讨 [J]. 全球教育展望, 2013 (9): 71-78.
[12] 蔺永政. 大学生学业能力演化建模与分析研究 [D]. 山东师范大学, 2021.
[13] 杨振芳. 大学生课程学习过程性评价的现状、问题与对策 [J]. 教育与考试, 2021, 4: 90-96.
[14] 黄光锋. 基于创新人才培养模式的学生学习过程评价体系研究 [J]. 河北工程大学学报, 2020, 37 (02): 115-119.
[15] 杨庆浈. 大学生专业课学习评价对学习参与的影响研究 [J]. 福建师范大学, 2020.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Yu He, Wang Nana, Wang Xiujuan. (2023). Research on the Framework of the Evaluation System of College Students' Learning Process. Science Discovery, 11(2), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20231102.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Yu He; Wang Nana; Wang Xiujuan. Research on the Framework of the Evaluation System of College Students' Learning Process. Sci. Discov. 2023, 11(2), 29-34. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20231102.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Yu He, Wang Nana, Wang Xiujuan. Research on the Framework of the Evaluation System of College Students' Learning Process. Sci Discov. 2023;11(2):29-34. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20231102.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sd.20231102.11,
      author = {Yu He and Wang Nana and Wang Xiujuan},
      title = {Research on the Framework of the Evaluation System of College Students' Learning Process},
      journal = {Science Discovery},
      volume = {11},
      number = {2},
      pages = {29-34},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sd.20231102.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20231102.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sd.20231102.11},
      abstract = {To construct the evaluation system of college students' learning process, there are three layers: target layer, criterion layer and sub-criterion layer. There are five first-level indicators in the criteria layer, which are the individuation of learning process, the individuation of learning analysis, the coupling of learning, the autonomy of learning process and the creativity of learning process. There are 17 secondary indicators in the sub-criteria layer. The establishment of a good hierarchical structure is the premise of using AHP to solve problems. The basis of analyzing problems is to build a multi-level structure by layering various influencing factors. To determine the relationship between the elements, and according to the controlling relationship of the upper layer to the factors of the lower layer, the influencing factors are hierarchical, and then the hierarchical structure model of the upper layer and the lower layer is constructed, the geometric average method is used to calculate the average of the experts. The geometric average method ensures the reciprocal character of the matrix. Six judgment matrices are obtained by sorting the data, using MATLAB tool to calculate the weight value of each layer index of each judgment matrix, and carry on the consistency test, obtain the weight value of each layer index, the judgment matrix has passed the consistency evaluation, to achieve the overall objectives of the system and put forward all the measures, decision-making programs.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Research on the Framework of the Evaluation System of College Students' Learning Process
    AU  - Yu He
    AU  - Wang Nana
    AU  - Wang Xiujuan
    Y1  - 2023/03/28
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20231102.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sd.20231102.11
    T2  - Science Discovery
    JF  - Science Discovery
    JO  - Science Discovery
    SP  - 29
    EP  - 34
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0650
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20231102.11
    AB  - To construct the evaluation system of college students' learning process, there are three layers: target layer, criterion layer and sub-criterion layer. There are five first-level indicators in the criteria layer, which are the individuation of learning process, the individuation of learning analysis, the coupling of learning, the autonomy of learning process and the creativity of learning process. There are 17 secondary indicators in the sub-criteria layer. The establishment of a good hierarchical structure is the premise of using AHP to solve problems. The basis of analyzing problems is to build a multi-level structure by layering various influencing factors. To determine the relationship between the elements, and according to the controlling relationship of the upper layer to the factors of the lower layer, the influencing factors are hierarchical, and then the hierarchical structure model of the upper layer and the lower layer is constructed, the geometric average method is used to calculate the average of the experts. The geometric average method ensures the reciprocal character of the matrix. Six judgment matrices are obtained by sorting the data, using MATLAB tool to calculate the weight value of each layer index of each judgment matrix, and carry on the consistency test, obtain the weight value of each layer index, the judgment matrix has passed the consistency evaluation, to achieve the overall objectives of the system and put forward all the measures, decision-making programs.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Liberal Education, Liaoning University of International Business and Economics, Dalian, China

  • School of Liberal Education, Liaoning University of International Business and Economics, Dalian, China

  • School of Liberal Education, Liaoning University of International Business and Economics, Dalian, China

  • Sections